Most Popular Articles

Background

The benefit of the addition of perioperative pembrolizumab to standard care with surgery and adjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous-cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is unclear.

Methods

In this phase 3, open-label trial, we randomly assigned participants with locally advanced HNSCC in a 1:1 ratio to receive 2 cycles of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab and 15 cycles of adjuvant pembrolizumab (both at a dose of 200 mg every 3 weeks) in addition to standard care (pembrolizumab group) or standard care alone (control group). Standard care was surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy with or without concomitant cisplatin. The primary end point was event-free survival, sequentially assessed in participants whose tumors expressed programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) with a combined positive score (CPS) of 10 or more (CPS-10 population), participants whose tumors expressed PD-L1 with a CPS of 1 or more (CPS-1 population), and all the participants. A higher CPS indicates a higher proportion of cells that express PD-L1.

Results

A total of 363 participants (234 with a CPS of ≥10 and 347 with a CPS of ≥1) were assigned to the pembrolizumab group and 351 (231 with a CPS of ≥10 and 335 with a CPS of ≥1) to the control group. Surgery was completed in approximately 88% of the participants in each group. At the first interim analysis, the median follow-up was 38.3 months. Event-free survival at 36 months was 59.8% in the pembrolizumab group and 45.9% in the control group (hazard ratio for progression, recurrence, or death, 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 0.88; two-sided P=0.004) in the CPS-10 population; 58.2% and 44.9%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.89; two-sided P=0.003), in the CPS-1 population; and 57.6% and 46.4%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.92; two-sided P=0.008), in the total population. Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 44.6% of the participants in the pembrolizumab group and in 42.9% of those in the control group, including death in 1.1% and 0.3%, respectively. Potentially immune-mediated adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 10.0% of the participants in the pembrolizumab group.

Conclusions

The addition of neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab to standard care significantly improved event-free survival among participants with locally advanced HNSCC. Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab did not affect the likelihood of surgical completion. No new safety signals were identified. (Funded by Merck Sharp and Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck [Rahway, NJ]; KEYNOTE-689 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03765918.)

Pembrolizumab in Head and Neck Cancer

In a phase 3 trial, the addition of neoadjuvant and adjuvant pembrolizumab to standard care improved event-free survival among participants with locally advanced head and neck cancer without affecting surgical outcomes.

Background

The effect of adjunctive glucocorticoids in the primary treatment of Kawasaki disease in unselected patients remains unknown.

Methods

In this multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial in China, we assigned participants with newly diagnosed Kawasaki disease in a 1:1 ratio to receive prednisolone plus standard treatment or standard treatment alone. The primary outcome was the occurrence of coronary-artery lesions at 1 month after illness onset. Prespecified key secondary outcomes, for which analyses were not controlled for multiplicity, included receipt of rescue therapy, duration of fever, change in the C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and changes in coronary-artery z scores.

Results

A total of 3208 participants underwent randomization, with coronary-artery lesions detected at baseline in 870 of 3184 participants (27.3%). At 1 month, coronary-artery lesions were detected in 16.0% of the participants receiving prednisolone plus standard treatment and in 13.8% of those receiving standard treatment alone (adjusted risk difference, 1.1 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -1.0 to 3.4; P=0.31). Rescue therapy was used in 4.6% of the participants receiving prednisolone plus standard therapy and in 10.1% of those receiving standard treatment alone; the median duration of fever was 8.4 hours and 13.2 hours, respectively, and the reductions in the C-reactive protein level at 72 hours were 67.5 mg per liter and 59.8 mg per liter. Decreases in coronary-artery z scores were similar in the two groups. At 3 months, the incidence of coronary-artery lesions was 12.6% with prednisolone plus standard therapy and 10.5% with standard treatment alone; the percentage of participants with progression of coronary-artery lesions was 28.6% and 28.9%, respectively, and the incidence of medium-to-giant coronary-artery aneurysms was 1.9% and 1.1%. The overall incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups.

Conclusions

The addition of prednisolone to standard primary treatment for Kawasaki disease did not reduce the incidence of coronary-artery lesions at 1 month after illness onset. (Funded by the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences and the National Natural Science Foundation of China; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04078568.)

Adjunctive Prednisolone for Kawasaki Disease

In a randomized trial involving 3208 children with Kawasaki disease, adding prednisolone to standard primary therapy did not reduce the incidence of coronary-artery lesions at 1 month.

BACKGROUND

Tirzepatide, a dual incretin agonist of the glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide receptors, has favorable effects on glycemic control and body weight. The effects on cardiovascular outcomes are uncertain.

METHODS

We conducted an active-comparator-controlled, double-blind, noninferiority trial in which patients with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a weekly subcutaneous injection of tirzepatide (up to 15 mg) or dulaglutide (1.5 mg), an agent that has been shown to reduce the incidence of cardiovascular events. The primary end point was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke and was tested for noninferiority of tirzepatide to dulaglutide with a margin of 1.05 for the upper limit of the 95.3% confidence interval for the hazard ratio. An upper limit of less than 1.00 was considered to indicate superiority of tirzepatide to dulaglutide.

RESULTS

A total of 13,299 patients underwent randomization; 134 were subsequently excluded because they did not meet inclusion criteria. The modified intention-to-treat population thus included 6586 patients in the tirzepatide group and 6579 in the dulaglutide group. The mean (±SD) age of the patients was 64.1±8.8 years, 29.0% were women, the mean body-mass index (the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) was 32.6±5.5, the mean glycated hemoglobin level was 8.4±0.9%, and the mean duration of diabetes was 14.7±8.8 years. A primary end-point event occurred in 801 patients (12.2%) in the tirzepatide group and 862 (13.1%) in the dulaglutide group (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95.3% confidence interval, 0.83 to 1.01; P=0.003 for noninferiority; P=0.09 for superiority). The incidence of adverse events appeared to be similar in the two groups, although more gastrointestinal adverse events were observed in the tirzepatide group.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, tirzepatide was noninferior to dulaglutide with respect to a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke. (Funded by Eli Lilly; SURPASS-CVOT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04255433.)

Cardiovascular Outcomes in Diabetes with Tirzepatide

In patients with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, tirzepatide was noninferior to dulaglutide with respect to major cardiovascular events.

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a chronic disease and causal precursor to myriad other conditions, including type 2 diabetes. In an earlier analysis of the SURMOUNT-1 trial, tirzepatide was shown to provide substantial and sustained reductions in body weight in persons with obesity over a 72-week period. Here, we report the 3-year safety outcomes with tirzepatide and its efficacy in reducing weight and delaying progression to type 2 diabetes in persons with both obesity and prediabetes.

METHODS

We performed a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial in which 2539 participants with obesity, of whom 1032 also had prediabetes, were assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive tirzepatide at a once-weekly dose of 5 mg, 10 mg, or 15 mg or placebo. The current analysis involved the participants with both obesity and prediabetes, who received their assigned dose of tirzepatide or placebo for a total of 176 weeks, followed by a 17-week off-treatment period. The three key secondary end points, which were controlled for type I error, were the percent change in body weight from baseline to week 176 and onset of type 2 diabetes during the 176-week and 193-week periods.

RESULTS

At 176 weeks, the mean percent change in body weight among the participants who received tirzepatide was −12.3% with the 5-mg dose, −18.7% with the 10-mg dose, and −19.7% with the 15-mg dose, as compared with −1.3% among those who received placebo (P<0.001 for all comparisons with placebo). Fewer participants received a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes in the tirzepatide groups than in the placebo group (1.3% vs. 13.3%; hazard ratio, 0.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.0 to 0.1; P<0.001). After 17 weeks off treatment or placebo, 2.4% of the participants who received tirzepatide and 13.7% of those who received placebo had type 2 diabetes (hazard ratio, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.1 to 0.2; P<0.001). Other than coronavirus disease 2019, the most common adverse events were gastrointestinal, most of which were mild to moderate in severity and occurred primarily during the dose-escalation period in the first 20 weeks of the trial. No new safety signals were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Three years of treatment with tirzepatide in persons with obesity and prediabetes resulted in substantial and sustained weight reduction and a markedly lower risk of progression to type 2 diabetes than that with placebo. (Funded by Eli Lilly; SURMOUNT-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04184622.)

One Pivotal Trial as the FDA Default

This Sounding Board announces a new FDA policy that the default requirement for FDA approvals will be one robust pivotal trial plus confirmatory evidence, rather than two trials.

BACKGROUND

Transthyretin amyloidosis with cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is a progressive, fatal disease. Vutrisiran, a subcutaneously administered RNA interference therapeutic agent, inhibits the production of hepatic transthyretin.

METHODS

In this double-blind, randomized trial, we assigned patients with ATTR-CM in a 1:1 ratio to receive vutrisiran (25 mg) or placebo every 12 weeks for up to 36 months. The primary end point was a composite of death from any cause and recurrent cardiovascular events. Secondary end points included death from any cause, the change from baseline in the distance covered on the 6-minute walk test, and the change from baseline in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Overall Summary (KCCQ-OS) score. The efficacy end points were assessed in the overall population and in the monotherapy population (the patients who were not receiving tafamidis at baseline) and were tested hierarchically.

RESULTS

A total of 655 patients underwent randomization; 326 were assigned to receive vutrisiran and 329 to receive placebo. Vutrisiran treatment led to a lower risk of death from any cause and recurrent cardiovascular events than placebo (hazard ratio in the overall population, 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56 to 0.93; P=0.01; hazard ratio in the monotherapy population, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.93; P=0.02) and a lower risk of death from any cause through 42 months (hazard ratio in the overall population, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.90; P=0.01). Among the patients in the overall population, 125 in the vutrisiran group and 159 in the placebo group had at least one primary end-point event. In the overall population, treatment with vutrisiran resulted in less of a decline in the distance covered on the 6-minute walk test than placebo (least-squares mean difference, 26.5 m; 95% CI, 13.4 to 39.6; P<0.001) and less of a decline in the KCCQ-OS score (least-squares mean difference, 5.8 points; 95% CI, 2.4 to 9.2; P<0.001). Similar benefits were observed in the monotherapy population. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two groups (99% in the vutrisiran group and 98% in the placebo group); serious adverse events occurred in 62% of the patients in the vutrisiran group and in 67% of those in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with ATTR-CM, treatment with vutrisiran led to a lower risk of death from any cause and cardiovascular events than placebo and preserved functional capacity and quality of life. (Funded by Alnylam Pharmaceuticals; HELIOS-B ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04153149.)

Background

The proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor evolocumab reduces the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) among patients with a previous myocardial infarction, stroke, or symptomatic peripheral artery disease. The effect of evolocumab on the risk of MACE among patients without a previous myocardial infarction or stroke is unknown.

Methods

We conducted an international, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of evolocumab in patients with atherosclerosis or diabetes and without a previous myocardial infarction or stroke who had a low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level of at least 90 mg per deciliter. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive evolocumab at a dose of 140 mg every 2 weeks or placebo. The two primary end points were a composite of death from coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke (3-point MACE) and a composite of 3-point MACE or ischemia-driven arterial revascularization (4-point MACE).

Results

A total of 12,257 patients were randomly assigned to receive evolocumab (6129 patients) or placebo (6128) and were included in the efficacy analyses. The median age of the patients was 66 years, 43% were women, and 93% were White. The median follow-up was 4.6 years. A 3-point MACE event occurred in 336 patients (5-year Kaplan-Meier estimate, 6.2%) in the evolocumab group, as compared with 443 (8.0%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65 to 0.86; P<0.001). A 4-point MACE event occurred in 747 patients (5-year Kaplan-Meier estimate, 13.4%) in the evolocumab group, as compared with 907 (16.2%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.89; P<0.001). No evidence of a between-group difference was seen in the incidence of safety events.

Conclusions

PCSK9 inhibition with evolocumab led to a lower risk of first cardiovascular events than placebo among patients with atherosclerosis or diabetes and without a previous myocardial infarction or stroke. (Funded by Amgen; VESALIUS-CV ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03872401.)

In Vivo CD19 CAR T-Cell Therapy in Refractory SLE

In patients with refractory systemic lupus erythematosus, in vivo generation of CD19 CAR T cells by means of lipid nanoparticles led to B-cell depletion, reduced disease activity, and no major toxic effects.

TREATMENT APPROACHES TO INSOMNIA

• Insomnia is common, and it frequently occurs when other medical, psychiatric, and other sleep disorders are present.

• Persistent insomnia is associated with substantial distress, functional impairment, and adverse health outcomes, including increased risks of major depression, hypertension, and work disability.

• Current guidelines recommend cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) as a first-line treatment for persistent insomnia. CBT-I includes practical strategies for modifying sleep habits, regulating sleep-wake schedules, reducing arousal from sleep, and reframing unhelpful beliefs about sleep and insomnia.

• Medications with an indication for insomnia (e.g., benzodiazepine receptor agonists, dual orexin receptor antagonists, and doxepin) that are approved by the Food and Drug Administration are recommended as alternative or adjunctive treatments. There is inadequate evidence to support over-the-counter medications, antipsychotics, or alternative agents for insomnia.

• Recommended therapies for insomnia produce clinically meaningful reductions in insomnia symptoms, sleep-onset latency, and time awake after sleep onset. CBT-I alone or with medication can promote rapid and sustained alleviation of insomnia symptoms over time.

Management of Insomnia

Insomnia is common and frequently occurs with other disorders. First-line cognitive behavioral therapy with or without medication can produce rapid, sustained alleviation of insomnia symptoms.

Fever of Unknown Origin

FUO despite a high-quality workup after a reasonable amount of time has elapsed to rule out self-limited fevers remains a challenge. The clinician must pay close attention to the patient history, aided by the development of molecular diagnostic tests, to distinguish infections from other causes.

Background

Triple-negative breast cancer is an aggressive breast cancer subtype, and there remains an unmet need to improve outcomes in patients with previously untreated, programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive, locally advanced unresectable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.

Methods

In this phase 3, open-label, international trial, we randomly assigned patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab or chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab. The primary end point was progression-free survival as assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary end points included overall survival, objective response (complete or partial response) and duration of response as assessed by blinded independent central review, and safety.

Results

A total of 443 patients were randomly assigned to receive sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab (221 patients) or chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab (222 patients). The median progression-free survival was 11.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.3 to 16.7) with sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab and 7.8 months (95% CI, 7.3 to 9.3) with chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.84; two-sided P<0.001). Data for overall survival were immature. The percentage of patients with an objective response was 60% (95% CI, 53 to 66) with sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab and 53% (95% CI, 46 to 60) with chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab; among patients with a response, the median duration of response was 16.5 months (95% CI, 12.7 to 19.5) and 9.2 months (95% CI, 7.6 to 11.3), respectively. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher occurred in 71% of the patients receiving sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab and in 70% of those receiving chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab; the incidence of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was 12% and 31%, respectively. Adverse events leading to death occurred in 3% of the patients in each group.

Conclusions

Sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab led to significantly longer progression-free survival than chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab among patients with previously untreated, PD-L1-positive, advanced triple-negative breast cancer. (Funded by Gilead Sciences; ASCENT-04/KEYNOTE-D19 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05382286.)

Sacituzumab Govitecan plus Pembrolizumab in Breast Cancer

In patients with previously untreated, PD-L1-positive, advanced triple-negative breast cancer, sacituzumab govitecan plus pembrolizumab led to significantly longer progression-free survival than chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab.

Background

Oral semaglutide at a dose of 25 mg may provide an alternative treatment option to injectable semaglutide (2.4 mg) and higher-dose oral semaglutide (50 mg) for persons with overweight or obesity.

Methods

In a 71-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 22 sites in four countries, we enrolled persons without diabetes who had a body-mass index (BMI; the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters) of 30 or higher or a BMI of 27 or higher with at least one obesity-related complication. The participants were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive oral semaglutide (25 mg) or placebo once daily, plus lifestyle interventions. The coprimary end points at week 64 were the percent change in body weight and a reduction of 5% or more in body weight; confirmatory secondary end points included reductions in body weight of 10% or more, 15% or more, and 20% or more and the change in the Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite Clinical Trials Version (IWQOL-Lite-CT) Physical Function score.

Results

A total of 205 participants were randomly assigned to receive oral semaglutide, and 102 to receive placebo. The estimated mean change in body weight from baseline to week 64 was −13.6% in the oral semaglutide group and −2.2% in the placebo group (estimated difference, −11.4 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, −13.9 to −9.0; P<0.001). Participants in the oral semaglutide group were significantly more likely than those in the placebo group to have body-weight reductions of 5% or more, 10% or more, 15% or more, and 20% or more (P<0.001 for all comparisons) and to have an improved IWQOL-Lite-CT Physical Function score (P<0.001). Gastrointestinal adverse events were more common with oral semaglutide than with placebo (74.0% vs. 42.2%).

Conclusions

Oral semaglutide at a dose of 25 mg once daily resulted in a greater mean reduction in body weight than placebo in participants with overweight or obesity. (Funded by Novo Nordisk; OASIS 4 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05564117.)

Management of Acute Type B Aortic Dissection

• Key risk factors for aortic dissection are hypertension and known genetic aortopathy.

• Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has largely replaced open surgery for patients presenting with complications (rupture or malperfusion).

• Uncomplicated type B aortic dissection is treated medically with blood-pressure control.

• TEVAR or open repair is indicated if complications develop during follow-up.

• Serial imaging and lifelong surveillance are recommended for all patients who have had an aortic dissection.

Type B Aortic Dissection

This review describes the current management of type B aortic dissection, including medical therapy and thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

Background

Zimislecel is an allogeneic stem cell-derived islet-cell therapy. Data on the safety and efficacy of zimislecel in persons with type 1 diabetes are needed.

Methods

We conducted a phase 1-2 study of zimislecel in persons with type 1 diabetes. In part A, participants received a half dose of zimislecel (0.4×10⁹ cells) as a single infusion into the portal vein, with an option for a second half dose within 2 years. In parts B and C, participants received a full dose of zimislecel (0.8×10⁹ cells) as a single infusion. All the participants also received glucocorticoid-free immunosuppressive therapy. The primary end point in part A was safety. The primary end point in part C was freedom from severe hypoglycemic events during days 90 through 365, with a glycated hemoglobin level of less than 7% or a decrease of at least 1 percentage point from baseline in the glycated hemoglobin level at one or more time points between days 180 and 365. Secondary end points in part C included safety and insulin independence between days 180 and 365. Assessment of the primary and secondary end points in part C involved the participants who received the full dose of zimislecel as a single infusion in part B or C. Detection of serum C-peptide during a 4-hour mixed-meal tolerance test was used to assess engraftment and islet function. All the analyses were interim and not prespecified.

Results

A total of 14 participants (2 in part A and 12 in parts B and C) completed at least 12 months of follow-up and were included in the analyses. C-peptide was undetectable at baseline in all 14 participants. After zimislecel infusion, all the participants had engraftment and islet function, as evidenced by the detection of C-peptide. Neutropenia was the most common serious adverse event, occurring in 3 participants. Two deaths occurred — one caused by cryptococcal meningitis and one by severe dementia with agitation owing to the progression of preexisting neurocognitive impairment. All 12 participants in parts B and C were free of severe hypoglycemic events and had a glycated hemoglobin level of less than 7%; these participants spent more than 70% of the time in the target glucose range (70 to 180 mg per deciliter). Ten of the 12 participants (83%) had insulin independence and were not using exogenous insulin at day 365.

Conclusions

The results of this small, short-term study involving persons with type 1 diabetes support the hypothesis that zimislecel can restore physiologic islet function, warranting further clinical investigation. (Funded by Vertex Pharmaceuticals; VX-880-101 FORWARD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04786262.)

Stem Cell−Derived Islets for Type 1 Diabetes

Zimislecel is an allogeneic stem cell-derived islet-cell therapy. This phase 1-2 study supports the hypothesis that zimislecel can restore physiologic islet function and thus treat persons with type 1 diabetes.

Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD)

• MASLD is a multisystem disease that has become a public-health problem worldwide.

• Metabolic dysfunction is key to the pathogenesis and consequences of MASLD.

• The clinical burden of MASLD consists mainly of liver-related disease and death and high rates of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, type 2 diabetes, and certain extrahepatic cancers, especially extrahepatic gastrointestinal cancers.

• There is a pressing need for drugs to treat MASLD and its more severe form, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH).

• In March 2024, resmetirom, a liver-directed, thyroid hormone receptor beta-selective agonist, was the first drug conditionally approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treating adults with noncirrhotic MASH and moderate-to-advanced fibrosis.

• Incretin-based drugs (especially semaglutide at a dose of 2.4 mg per week) and other metabolism-based pharmacotherapies are showing promise as therapeutic options not only for steatotic liver disease but also for cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic complications that are strongly related to MASLD.

Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease

MASLD has become the most common chronic liver disease worldwide. The authors review the features of the disease as well as pharmacotherapies targeting the associated liver and cardiovascular-renal-metabolic issues.

Background

Semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, is a candidate for the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH).

Methods

In this ongoing phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we assigned 1197 patients with biopsy-defined MASH and fibrosis stage 2 or 3 in a 2:1 ratio to receive once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide at a dose of 2.4 mg or placebo for 240 weeks. The results of a planned interim analysis conducted at week 72 involving the first 800 patients are reported here (part 1). The primary end points for part 1 were the resolution of steatohepatitis without worsening of liver fibrosis and reduction in liver fibrosis without worsening of steatohepatitis.

Results

Resolution of steatohepatitis without worsening of fibrosis occurred in 62.9% of the 534 patients in the semaglutide group and in 34.3% of the 266 patients in the placebo group (estimated difference, 28.7 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 21.1 to 36.2; P<0.001). A reduction in liver fibrosis without worsening of steatohepatitis was reported in 36.8% of the patients in the semaglutide group and in 22.4% of those in the placebo group (estimated difference, 14.4 percentage points; 95% CI, 7.5 to 21.3; P<0.001). Results for the three secondary outcomes that were included in the plan to adjust for multiple testing were as follows: combined resolution of steatohepatitis and reduction in liver fibrosis was reported in 32.7% of the patients in the semaglutide group and in 16.1% of those in the placebo group (estimated difference, 16.5 percentage points; 95% CI, 10.2 to 22.8; P<0.001). The mean change in body weight was −10.5% with semaglutide and −2.0% with placebo (estimated difference, −8.5 percentage points; 95% CI, −9.6 to −7.4; P<0.001). Mean changes in bodily pain scores did not differ significantly between the two groups. Gastrointestinal adverse events were more common in the semaglutide group.

Conclusions

In patients with MASH and moderate or advanced liver fibrosis, once-weekly semaglutide at a dose of 2.4 mg improved liver histologic results. (Funded by Novo Nordisk; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04822181.)

Semaglutide in MASH

In this interim analysis of a phase 3 trial involving 800 patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis, once-weekly semaglutide improved liver histologic results at 72 weeks.

BACKGROUND

Aldosterone synthase controls the synthesis of aldosterone and has been a pharmacologic target for the treatment of hypertension for several decades. Selective inhibition of aldosterone synthase is essential but difficult to achieve because cortisol synthesis is catalyzed by another enzyme that shares 93% sequence similarity with aldosterone synthase. In preclinical and phase 1 studies, baxdrostat had 100:1 selectivity for enzyme inhibition, and baxdrostat at several dose levels reduced plasma aldosterone levels but not cortisol levels.

METHODS

In this multicenter, placebo-controlled trial, we randomly assigned patients who had treatment-resistant hypertension, with blood pressure of 130/80 mm Hg or higher, and who were receiving stable doses of at least three antihypertensive agents, including a diuretic, to receive baxdrostat (0.5 mg, 1 mg, or 2 mg) once daily for 12 weeks or placebo. The primary end point was the change in systolic blood pressure from baseline to week 12 in each baxdrostat group as compared with the placebo group.

RESULTS

A total of 248 patients completed the trial. Dose-dependent changes in systolic blood pressure of -20.3 mm Hg, -17.5 mm Hg, -12.1 mm Hg, and -9.4 mm Hg were observed in the 2-mg, 1-mg, 0.5-mg, and placebo groups, respectively. The difference in the change in systolic blood pressure between the 2-mg group and the placebo group was -11.0 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI], -16.4 to -5.5; P<0.001), and the difference in this change between the 1-mg group and the placebo group was -8.1 mm Hg (95% CI, -13.5 to -2.8; P=0.003). No deaths occurred during the trial, no serious adverse events were attributed by the investigators to baxdrostat, and there were no instances of adrenocortical insufficiency. Baxdrostat-related increases in the potassium level to 6.0 mmol per liter or greater occurred in 2 patients, but these increases did not recur after withdrawal and reinitiation of the drug.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with treatment-resistant hypertension who received baxdrostat had dose-related reductions in blood pressure. (Funded by CinCor Pharma; BrigHTN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04519658.)

Background

Increased levels of the inflammatory biomarker high-sensitivity C-reactive protein predict cardiovascular events. Since statins lower levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein as well as cholesterol, we hypothesized that people with elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels but without hyperlipidemia might benefit from statin treatment.

Methods

We randomly assigned 17,802 apparently healthy men and women with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels of less than 130 mg per deciliter (3.4 mmol per liter) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels of 2.0 mg per liter or higher to rosuvastatin, 20 mg daily, or placebo and followed them for the occurrence of the combined primary end point of myocardial infarction, stroke, arterial revascularization, hospitalization for unstable angina, or death from cardiovascular causes.

Results

The trial was stopped after a median follow-up of 1.9 years (maximum, 5.0). Rosuvastatin reduced LDL cholesterol levels by 50% and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels by 37%. The rates of the primary end point were 0.77 and 1.36 per 100 person-years of follow-up in the rosuvastatin and placebo groups, respectively (hazard ratio for rosuvastatin, 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46 to 0.69; P<0.00001), with corresponding rates of 0.17 and 0.37 for myocardial infarction (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.70; P=0.0002), 0.18 and 0.34 for stroke (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.79; P=0.002), 0.41 and 0.77 for revascularization or unstable angina (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.70; P<0.00001), 0.45 and 0.85 for the combined end point of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.69; P<0.00001), and 1.00 and 1.25 for death from any cause (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.97; P=0.02). Consistent effects were observed in all subgroups evaluated. The rosuvastatin group did not have a significant increase in myopathy or cancer but did have a higher incidence of physician-reported diabetes.

Conclusions

In this trial of apparently healthy persons without hyperlipidemia but with elevated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels, rosuvastatin significantly reduced the incidence of major cardiovascular events. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00239681.)